Skip to content
Home » Intel Arc A380 struggles in opposition to AMD’s worst RDNA 2 GPU

Intel Arc A380 struggles in opposition to AMD’s worst RDNA 2 GPU

Intel Arc A380 struggles against AMD's worst RDNA 2 GPU

Intel Arc Alchemist A380 is Intel’s first desktop graphics card within the lineup, and as of in the present day, the primary evaluations of the GPU began rolling in because the embargo had been lifted. Unfortunately, the primary take a look at Intel Arc doesn’t bode effectively for the cardboard.

According to early evaluations, Intel’s A380 struggles to compete even in opposition to probably the most low-end GPUs made by AMD and Nvidia.


After a sequence of early leaks, Intel Arc A380 appeared in a video posted by Shenmedounengce on Bilibili. The mannequin in query is definitely a customized model of the cardboard, the Gunnir A380 Photon. It differs from the essential model of Intel Arc a bit of bit — it comes with two followers and a barely increased clock velocity of 2450MHz.

The A380 options the total ACM-G11 GPU and comes with 8 Xe-Cores in addition to 6GB of GDDR6 reminiscence and a 96-bit reminiscence bus. Although the GPU makes use of 16Gbps Samsung modules, this mannequin’s reminiscence is configured for 15.5Gbps, which is lower than the model supplied by Intel. So far, that is the one customized design of the GPU that we’ve seen.

For the aim of testing, the reviewer paired the Arc A380 with an Intel Alder Lake Core i5-12400 processor, B660 motherboard, and DD4 RAM. The GPU was examined in artificial benchmarks on 3DMark TimeSpy and Port Royal, however it was additionally put to the check in real-world gaming environments. In each circumstances, it was in comparison with entry-level choices from Nvidia and AMD, together with the GeForce GTX 1650, the RTX 3050, and the Radeon RX 6400 in addition to 6500 XT. These are certainly the GPUs Intel can hope to compete in opposition to with the A380, however sadly, the cardboard appears to fall brief.

The artificial benchmarks went effectively sufficient for the A380. It proved itself to be quicker than the RX 6400/6500 XT and the GTX 1650. However, Nvidia’s RTX 3050 has it beat in each Port Royal and Time Spy, and within the former, the distinction is huge — the RTX 3500 is 3.7 occasions quicker than the A380. The distinction between the 2 playing cards is way smaller within the TimeSpy check.

Intel Arc A380 gaming benchmark.Shenmedounengce

It’s all downhill from there once we transfer on to precise gaming exams. Shenmedounengce examined the GPU in League of Legends, PUBG, Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 5, GTA 5, and Red Dead Redemption II. In each single one in all these video games, the Intel Arc A380 was outperformed by each AMD and Nvidia when enjoying at 1080p. On the upside, the A380 got here very shut in some video games.

Intel Arc Alchemist has been having a reasonably tough time. Just just lately, Intel’s claims in regards to the efficiency of the GPU had been intently examined, and it appears that evidently we’d have to decrease our expectations regarding the sort of gaming prowess we will count on from Intel Arc. The staggered launch of the GPU, which is correct now solely obtainable in China in pre-built PCs, can be not serving to it shine.

Of course, there is likely to be hope but for Intel Arc. Perhaps additional driver optimizations will end in a rise in efficiency, and as time goes on and the flagship A770 is launched, Intel may develop into aggressive. As it stands now, Intel is prone to have a tough time profitable over many customers, contemplating that each AMD and Nvidia entry-level choices at the moment are available, and their costs are nearing MSRP.

Editors’ Recommendations

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *